Asus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics26.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive88.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory7.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190715
Uptime2.6 Days
Run DateDec 12 '22 at 22:54
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 65%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400-$161
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
66.1% Good
Memory 61.1
1-Core 116
2-Core 219
71% 132 Pts
4-Core 390
8-Core 513
58% 452 Pts
64-Core 552
34% 552 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Gigabyte(1458 3765) 2GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 526.98
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.3% Poor
Lighting 33.2
Reflection 40.5
Parallax 32.8
27% 35.5 fps
MRender 37.5
Gravity 33.7
Splatting 23.4
25% 31.5 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Mushkin MKNSSDHL250GB-D8 250GB
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1111A0L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 122 125 201 67 55 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Read 1,214
Write 297
Mixed 121
SusWrite 103
93% 434 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 34.4
4K Mixed 8.1
66% 22.4 MB/s
DQ Read 508
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 394
278% 361 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 199%
WD WD10EURX 1TB-$25
141GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 101 109 102 107 107 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
47.6% Average
Read 62.2
Write 75.7
Mixed 49.8
SusWrite 104
54% 72.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
103% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 87%
Seagate ST2000LM015-2E8174 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 123 124 124 123 124 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
67.7% Good
Read 112
Write 125
Mixed 61.2
SusWrite 124
77% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
200% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2A2666C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
71% Very good
MC Read 28.2
MC Write 29
MC Mixed 24.4
78% 27.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 14.4
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 124
32% 124 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 71%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,272 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $438
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback