Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics13.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive47.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-HDV R4.0  (all builds)
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211115
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 18 '22 at 10:55
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 1200 Quad-Core
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
67.4% Good
Memory 75.1
1-Core 107
2-Core 213
73% 132 Pts
4-Core 339
8-Core 374
47% 357 Pts
64-Core 390
24% 390 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Device(7377 0000) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
13.6% Very poor
Lighting 16.4
Reflection 17.7
Parallax 18.3
13% 17.5 fps
MRender 16
Gravity 18.9
Splatting 16.8
14% 17.2 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
194GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF8704RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 255 92 126 133 134 137 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
47.3% Average
Read 444
Write 339
Mixed 177
SusWrite 146
61% 277 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 38.3
4K Mixed 4.1
60% 21.7 MB/s
DQ Read 111
DQ Write 72.1
DQ Mixed 31.4
40% 71.6 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 56%
Kingston RBUSC180DS37128GJ 128GB
119GB free
Firmware: SBFK61E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 224 108 76 76 75 76 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Read 495
Write 428
Mixed 366
SusWrite 106
78% 349 MB/s
4K Read 35.1
4K Write 75.9
4K Mixed 33
136% 48 MB/s
DQ Read 247
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 194
173% 257 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown NMUD480E82-3200D 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
47.3% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 15
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 15.6
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 90.1
44% 90.1 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 6,071 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $342
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback