Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 7.79%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	IBM System x3500 M4 Server -[7383E1G]- (all builds)
Motherboard	IBM 46W9224
Memory	43.3 GB free of 48 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121122
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 19 '22 at 11:14
Run Duration	173 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2603 0 224 User benchmarks, average bench 50% Socket 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg) Relative performance (0^th percentile)	7.79% Terrible	Memory 7.65 1-Core 16.6 2-Core 27.3 9% 17.2 Pts	4-Core 46.8 8-Core 40.8 6% 43.8 Pts	64-Core 40.8 2% 40.8 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 7.79% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
IBM ServeRAID M1115 999GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 658GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 20 22 21 23 27 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	40.6% Average	Read 118 Write 41 Mixed 65 SusWrite 21.8 46% 61.5 MB/s	4K Read 6 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.8 350% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 40.6% Great: 41%
XinTop XT-U3Y3502 1TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 35GB free, PID 0611 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.9 7.1 7 7.6 8 8.7 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	9.54% Terrible	Read 50.6 Write 14.2 Mixed 14.9 SusWrite 7.4 23% 21.8 MB/s	4K Read 2.5 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.4 23% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 9.54% Great: 50%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B1K70DH0-YH9 M393B2G70BH0-YH9 M393B2G70BH0-YH9 M393B1K70DH0-YH9 48GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 16384, 16384, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	8.11% Terrible	MC Read 2.8 MC Write 3.1 MC Mixed 2.7 8% 2.87 GB/s	SC Read 2.1 SC Write 2 SC Mixed 1.9 6% 2 GB/s	Latency 426 9% 426 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16