ADD TO PC
BUILD

Toshiba SATELLITE PRO L870-149

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	5.15% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	39.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Toshiba SATELLITE PRO L870-149 (all builds)
Motherboard	Type2 Type2 - Board Product Name1
Memory	5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20131001
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 11 '17 at 23:50
Run Duration	99 Seconds
Run User	IRL-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52 79,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	59.5% Above average	Memory 88.1 1-Core 74.1 2-Core 119 60% 93.8 Pts	4-Core 181 8-Core 185 24% 183 Pts	64-Core 199 12% 199 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 59.5% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7600M 7,895 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Toshiba(1179 FB41) 2GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004 Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	5.15% Terrible	Lighting 6.7 Reflection 6.54 Parallax 5.34 6% 6.19 fps	MRender 6.33 Gravity 4.77 Splatting 5.61 4% 5.57 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.15% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Plextor PX-64M2S 64GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 22GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 312 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 30 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 0 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 0 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0	39.5% Below average	Read 325 Write 103 Mixed 156 42% 195 MB/s	4K Read 15.6 4K Write 33.2 4K Mixed 14.2 59% 21 MB/s	DQ Read 68 DQ Write 34.3 DQ Mixed 20.8 24% 41 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 39.5% Great: 48%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173BH0-CK0 2x4GB 2,461 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	55.6% Above average	MC Read 19.8 MC Write 21 MC Mixed 18 56% 19.6 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 15.5 43% 14.9 GB/s	Latency 69.4 58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 55.6% Great: 55%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback