Today's hottest deals

User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics17.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive124% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
21 months ago, 21 months ago.
SystemHUANANZHI
MotherboardHUANANZHI X99-8M-F
Memory3.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201015
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateDec 25 '22 at 18:39
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User PER-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
63.6% Good
Memory 79.1
1-Core 78.5
2-Core 145
61% 101 Pts
4-Core 260
8-Core 442
43% 351 Pts
64-Core 672
42% 672 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 560-B
Sapphire(1DA2 E348) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1216 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.30.23.04
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
17.5% Very poor
Lighting 20.8
Reflection 27.8
Parallax 30.8
17% 26.5 fps
MRender 26.1
Gravity 23.5
Splatting 20
19% 23.2 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
NE-256 256GB
105GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1202A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 719 143 237 115 136 225 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 1,448
Write 1,001
Mixed 928
SusWrite 262
202% 910 MB/s
4K Read 33.8
4K Write 65.8
4K Mixed 23.1
116% 40.9 MB/s
DQ Read 392
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 378
280% 370 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 124%
Great: 234%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
730GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 151 147 147 141 131 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Read 154
Write 141
Mixed 93.7
SusWrite 146
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
190% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 109%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
777GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 118 118 118 121 116 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
53% Above average
Read 66.8
Write 110
Mixed 47.7
SusWrite 117
62% 85.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.6
191% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 53%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HX426C16FB2/8 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
53% Above average
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 17.5
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 12.5
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 82.2
49% 82.2 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 53%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $365
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback