Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive57% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200803
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 27 '22 at 14:51
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G-$75
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
66.6% Good
Memory 71.7
1-Core 106
2-Core 218
73% 132 Pts
4-Core 354
8-Core 370
48% 362 Pts
64-Core 387
24% 387 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 74%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA400M8120G 120GB
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03090004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 41 46 48 45 48 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
57% Above average
Read 455
Write 288
Mixed 150
SusWrite 66.1
53% 240 MB/s
4K Read 5.9
4K Write 60.4
4K Mixed 36.1
87% 34.1 MB/s
DQ Read 145
DQ Write 120
DQ Mixed 113
90% 126 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 57%
Great: 87%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$31
57GB free
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 42 41 41 42 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
31.7% Below average
Read 69.2
Write 36.4
Mixed 35.2
SusWrite 41.2
34% 45.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
128% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 60%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$48
246GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 197 188 194 187 196 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
83.7% Excellent
Read 102
Write 132
Mixed 73
SusWrite 190
91% 124 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0
78% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-559A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
99.7% Outstanding
MC Read 37.9
MC Write 38.1
MC Mixed 33.7
104% 36.6 GB/s
SC Read 23.1
SC Write 39.1
SC Mixed 27.2
85% 29.8 GB/s
Latency 97.6
41% 97.6 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 99.7%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,720 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $407
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback