Asrock Z790 Taichi

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 137%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive642% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z790 Taichi  (all builds)
Memory56.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221216
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 30 '22 at 05:13
Run Duration232 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13900KF-$400
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 5.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
137% Outstanding
Memory 95.2
1-Core 251
2-Core 501
145% 282 Pts
4-Core 958
8-Core 1,822
165% 1,390 Pts
64-Core 4,582
284% 4,582 Pts
Poor: 123%
This bench: 137%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB-$150
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 620311WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4004 4491 4426 4488 4414 4520 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
642% Outstanding
Read 4,071
Write 4,549
Mixed 3353
SusWrite 4,390
924% 4,091 MB/s
4K Read 77.9
4K Write 263
4K Mixed 103
389% 148 MB/s
DQ Read 2,361
DQ Write 1,800
DQ Mixed 2,027
1,531% 2,063 MB/s
Poor: 293%
This bench: 642%
Great: 666%
External USB3.0 DISK00 8TB
97GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
22.1% Poor
Read 111
Write 126
Mixed 67.1
SusWrite 0.1
96% 76 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1.1
105% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 22.1%
Great: 75%
External USB3.0 DISK01 8TB
332GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
23.9% Poor
Read 123
Write 132
Mixed 65.6
SusWrite 0.2
100% 80.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1.1
105% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 23.9%
Great: 90%
External USB3.0 DISK02 4TB
3GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 68.1
Write 76.6
Mixed 68.1
93% 70.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
63% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 8% Great: 66%
External USB3.0 DISK03 4TB
113GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 130 130 144 146 138 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
54.6% Above average
Read 126
Write 126
Mixed 91.9
SusWrite 136
163% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
102% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 80%
External USB3.0 DISK04 18TB
15TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 130 131 144 146 138 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
88.5% Excellent
Read 266
Write 267
Mixed 140
SusWrite 136
263% 202 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 6.5
4K Mixed 0.8
252% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F5-6400J3239G164x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
222% Outstanding
MC Read 89.6
MC Write 86.5
MC Mixed 84.5
248% 86.9 GB/s
SC Read 28.7
SC Write 57
SC Mixed 44.1
124% 43.3 GB/s
Latency 56.6
71% 56.6 ns
Poor: 132%
This bench: 222%
Great: 215%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z790 Taichi Builds (Compare 255 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 453%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 125%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 596%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock Z790 Taichi

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $2,221
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback