Alienware m17 R5 AMD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics22.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive203% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAlienware m17 R5 AMD  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 0R5XW9
Memory52.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221215
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 31 '22 at 15:02
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
FP7, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
73.8% Very good
Memory 66.5
1-Core 159
2-Core 298
92% 174 Pts
4-Core 436
8-Core 724
71% 580 Pts
64-Core 914
57% 914 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Dell(1028 0B5B) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.11.2
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
22.6% Poor
Lighting 25.4
Reflection 133
Parallax 45.8
21% 67.9 fps
MRender 25.3
Gravity 29.2
Splatting 38.5
26% 31 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 22.6%
Great: 35%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ca6-8d1024-q11 NVMe SSSTC 1024GB
571GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 24201114 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1165 906 938 1160 951 848 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
203% Outstanding
Read 1,581
Write 1,486
Mixed 1,437
SusWrite 995
309% 1,375 MB/s
4K Read 49.2
4K Write 78.1
4K Mixed 57.2
189% 61.5 MB/s
DQ Read 698
DQ Write 221
DQ Mixed 539
377% 486 MB/s
Poor: 145%
This bench: 203%
Great: 460%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KF548S38-32 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
115% Outstanding
MC Read 39
MC Write 48.5
MC Mixed 40.7
122% 42.7 GB/s
SC Read 23.4
SC Write 48.7
SC Mixed 27.2
95% 33.1 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 115%
This bench: 115%
Great: 163%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical m17 R5 AMD Builds (Compare 148 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

System: Alienware m17 R5 AMD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback