Amazon t3.2xlarge

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAmazon t3.2xlarge  (all builds)
MotherboardAmazon
Memory26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171016
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 05 '23 at 14:51
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 54%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon Platinum 8259CL
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
36.1% Below average
Memory 39.3
1-Core 48.3
2-Core 95.7
35% 61.1 Pts
4-Core 176
8-Core 314
30% 245 Pts
64-Core 358
22% 358 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 75%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Amazon Elastic B 32GB
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 63 64 58 79 66 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
19.1% Very poor
Read 1.3
Write 74.5
Mixed 21.5
SusWrite 64.1
30% 40.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.3
234% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 86%
Nvme Amazon Elastic B 1TB
961GB free
Firmware: 1.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 15 16 16 16 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
21.2% Poor
Read 57.7
Write 14
Mixed 18.5
SusWrite 16.4
20% 26.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.2
45% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 21.2%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x31GB
1 of 1 slots used
31GB DIMM DDR4 2933 MHz
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
40.8% Average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 14
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 2.3
SC Write 3.5
SC Mixed 3.4
9% 3.07 GB/s
Latency 205
20% 205 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 241%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback