Today's hottest deals

HP Victus by HP Laptop 16-d0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive220% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
22 months ago, 22 months ago.
SystemHP Victus by HP Laptop 16-d0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 88F8
Memory4.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220303
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJan 09 '23 at 14:00
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 52%

 PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11800H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Memory 63
1-Core 88.8
2-Core 153
58% 102 Pts
4-Core 283
8-Core 472
46% 378 Pts
64-Core 659
41% 659 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
HP(103C 88F8) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.2079
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
4.92% Terrible
Lighting 5.7
Reflection 36.5
Parallax 7.2
5% 16.5 fps
MRender 6.9
Gravity 7.7
Splatting 5.7
5% 6.77 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.92%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVL21T0HCLR-00BH1 1TB
471GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2NGXH Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1639 1583 1560 1481 1501 1477 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
220% Outstanding
Read 1,734
Write 1,898
Mixed 1,345
SusWrite 1,540
367% 1,629 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 73.9
4K Mixed 36.3
124% 45.1 MB/s
DQ Read 523
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 369
288% 403 MB/s
Poor: 220%
This bench: 220%
Great: 436%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
73.8% Very good
MC Read 31.8
MC Write 28.2
MC Mixed 25.5
82% 28.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 21.9
SC Mixed 11.7
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Victus by HP Laptop 16-d0xxx Builds (Compare 4,166 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: HP Victus by HP Laptop 16-d0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback