Today's hottest deals

Siemens SIMATIC IPC847E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics4.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive88% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
22 months ago, 22 months ago.
SystemSiemens SIMATIC IPC847E  (all builds)
MotherboardSIEMENS A5E42886687
Memory60.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210701
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 10 '23 at 17:19
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E-2278GE
no information, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Memory 74.5
1-Core 135
2-Core 263
85% 158 Pts
4-Core 502
8-Core 971
87% 736 Pts
64-Core 1,210
75% 1,210 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics P630
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
4.7% Terrible
Lighting 5.5
Reflection 9.4
Parallax 8.1
4% 7.67 fps
MRender 12.9
Gravity 8.5
Splatting 0.2
5% 7.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.7%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_5200_MTFDDAK480TDC 480GB
377GB free (System drive)
Firmware: D1MU020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 365 367 370 368 364 370 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
88% Excellent
Read 324
Write 371
Mixed 261
SusWrite 368
75% 331 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 92.4
4K Mixed 31.5
128% 49.8 MB/s
DQ Read 302
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 270
214% 296 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 88%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16ATF2G64AZ-3G2J1 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
57.5% Above average
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 21.7
MC Mixed 18.2
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 24.3
SC Mixed 17.1
52% 18 GB/s
Latency 91.4
44% 91.4 ns
Poor: 90%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 123%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SIMATIC IPC847E Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Siemens SIMATIC IPC847E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $145
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback