PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 2.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 83.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock Z77E-ITX (all builds) |
Memory | 4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20130712 |
Uptime | 1.1 Days |
Run Date | Jan 10 '23 at 20:58 |
Run Duration | 151 Seconds |
Run User | SWE-User |
Background CPU | 39% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i3-3225-$325
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
|
54.6%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)-$15
ASRock(1849 0162) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
|
2.93%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
193GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 290 249 297 309 312 300 MB/s
|
83.7%
Excellent
|
|||
WD Elements 2TB
234GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 32 34 34 35 35 MB/s
|
16.9%
Very poor
|
|||
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB-$10
52GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 19 19 19 20 MB/s
|
15%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
50.8%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-3570KIntel $80Bench 68%, 185,516 samples | 56x |
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 24x |
Core i7-3770KIntel $150Bench 72%, 165,979 samples | 22x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 14x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $200Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 11x |
RTX 2060Nvidia $140Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 10x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 92% - Outstanding | Total price: $164 |