Today's hottest deals

Asrock Z77E-ITX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive83.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z77E-ITX  (all builds)
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130712
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateJan 10 '23 at 20:58
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3225-$325
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Memory 80
1-Core 74.9
2-Core 128
58% 94.2 Pts
4-Core 169
8-Core 183
23% 176 Pts
64-Core 187
12% 187 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)-$15
ASRock(1849 0162) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
2.93% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 2.5
3% 2.6 fps
MRender 4.2
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 4.2
3% 3.5 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.93%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
193GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 290 249 297 309 312 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
83.7% Excellent
Read 468
Write 314
Mixed 299
SusWrite 293
77% 343 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 57.2
4K Mixed 33.1
116% 39.6 MB/s
DQ Read 298
DQ Write 207
DQ Mixed 226
176% 244 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 128%
WD Elements 2TB
234GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 32 34 34 35 35 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
16.9% Very poor
Read 33.4
Write 34.1
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 33.7
44% 32.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
82% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 44%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB-$10
52GB free, PID 5581
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 19 19 19 20 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
15% Very poor
Read 59.5
Write 20.4
Mixed 20.4
SusWrite 18.4
34% 29.7 MB/s
4K Read 9.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 1
71% 3.63 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
50.8% Above average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 17.6
51% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 14.7
SC Mixed 15.6
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 80.6
50% 80.6 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77E-ITX Builds (Compare 152 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock Z77E-ITX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $164
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback