Valve Jupiter

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics17.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemValve Jupiter  (all builds)
MotherboardValve Jupiter
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display800 x 1280 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220820
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateJan 14 '23 at 20:54
Run Duration84 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Custom APU 0405
FP6, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Memory 40.9
1-Core 116
2-Core 219
65% 125 Pts
4-Core 384
8-Core 553
59% 468 Pts
64-Core 564
35% 564 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Custom GPU 0405
AMD(1002 0123) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 22.20.19.06
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Lighting 19.5
Reflection 26.2
Parallax 34.8
16% 26.8 fps
MRender 24.4
Gravity 22.2
Splatting 29.2
21% 25.3 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Om3pdp3-ad NVMe KDI 512GB
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10100002 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,193
Write 1,104
Mixed 1,076
251% 1,124 MB/s
4K Read 39.9
4K Write 85.2
4K Mixed 52.7
173% 59.3 MB/s
DQ Read 832
DQ Write 420
DQ Mixed 735
517% 663 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 205%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown K3LK7K70BM-BGCP000 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB 23h 4266 MHz clocked @ 5500 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.6% Good
MC Read 22.8
MC Write 23.7
MC Mixed 28.1
71% 24.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 23
SC Mixed 19.4
54% 19 GB/s
Latency 198
20% 198 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Jupiter Builds (Compare 49 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

System: Valve Jupiter

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $376WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback