Micro UM690

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics34.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive411% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
17 months ago, 17 months ago.
SystemMicro UM690  (all builds)
MotherboardShenzhen F7BFC
Memory25.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221215
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJan 18 '23 at 08:38
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HX
FP7, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
97% Outstanding
Memory 68.9
1-Core 174
2-Core 339
101% 194 Pts
4-Core 669
8-Core 1,134
110% 902 Pts
64-Core 1,344
83% 1,344 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 97%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
AMD(1002 1681) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.11.2
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
34.7% Below average
Lighting 41.6
Reflection 53.3
Parallax 73.3
34% 56.1 fps
MRender 25.9
Gravity 44.9
Splatting 55.9
36% 42.2 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 35%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SFYRS1000G 1TB
872GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EIFK31.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3499 3601 3331 913 1147 1213 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
411% Outstanding
Read 2,699
Write 4,010
Mixed 2,829
SusWrite 2,284
669% 2,956 MB/s
4K Read 61.4
4K Write 243
4K Mixed 86.7
333% 130 MB/s
DQ Read 1,578
DQ Write 1,200
DQ Mixed 1,406
1,047% 1,395 MB/s
Poor: 247%
This bench: 411%
Great: 573%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF548S38-16 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
104% Outstanding
MC Read 38.2
MC Write 40.5
MC Mixed 37.6
111% 38.8 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 38
SC Mixed 24.3
80% 27.9 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 104%
This bench: 104%
Great: 151%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical UM690 Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat

System: Micro UM690

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback