HP ZBook Fury 17.3 Inch G8 Mobile Workstation PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.62% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
17 months ago, 17 months ago.
SystemHP ZBook Fury 17.3 Inch G8 Mobile Workstation PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 886D
Memory21 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221017
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJan 18 '23 at 15:42
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-11900H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
65.1% Good
Memory 56.1
1-Core 144
2-Core 233
78% 144 Pts
4-Core 398
8-Core 688
66% 543 Pts
64-Core 1,077
67% 1,077 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
HP(103C 886D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.3358
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
4.62% Terrible
Lighting 4.8
Reflection 38
Parallax 6.2
4% 16.3 fps
MRender 8
Gravity 9.5
Splatting 5.3
6% 7.6 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.62%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB2T0HALB-000H7 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS0TEXG
SusWrite @10s intervals: 461 604 581 609 642 613 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 791
Write 547
Mixed 598
SusWrite 585
141% 630 MB/s
4K Read 43.9
4K Write 77.1
4K Mixed 9.8
120% 43.6 MB/s
DQ Read 35.1
DQ Write 55.1
DQ Mixed 37.1
30% 42.4 MB/s
Poor: 103%
This bench: 103%
Great: 307%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAA4GS6CJR8N-XN 1x31GB
1 of 4 slots used
31GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
41.4% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 13.1
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 8.7
32% 11 GB/s
Latency 140
29% 140 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ZBook Fury 17.3 Inch G8 Mobile Workstation PC Builds (Compare 579 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: HP ZBook Fury 17.3 Inch G8 Mobile Workstation PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback