Today's hottest deals

Asus ROG STRIX X670E-E GAMING WIFI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 122%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive508% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X670E-E GAMING WIFI  (all builds)
Memory56.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220819
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 18 '23 at 16:52
Run Duration288 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 6800-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X-$327
AM5, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 5.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
122% Outstanding
Memory 80.7
1-Core 222
2-Core 436
127% 246 Pts
4-Core 872
8-Core 1,656
150% 1,264 Pts
64-Core 2,893
179% 2,893 Pts
Poor: 96%
This bench: 122%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6800-XT-$650
Gigabyte(1458 2328) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 22.11.2
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 199
Reflection 237
Parallax 423
162% 286 fps
Gravity 161
Splatting 303
216% 232 fps
Poor: 165% Great: 178%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Samsung SSD 980 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3011 2740 3149 3165 3104 3143 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
508% Outstanding
Read 3041
Write 3,308
Mixed 3,109
SusWrite 3,052
707% 3,127 MB/s
4K Read 77.3
4K Write 224
4K Mixed 116
384% 139 MB/s
DQ Read 2,017
DQ Write 1,603
DQ Mixed 1804
1,352% 1,808 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 508%
Great: 528%
Nvme Samsung SSD 990 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0B2QJXD7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4379 4662 4692 4707 2988 1768 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
565% Outstanding
Read 3,205
Write 4,964
Mixed 3,582
SusWrite 3,866
886% 3,904 MB/s
4K Read 70.2
4K Write 259
4K Mixed 109
383% 146 MB/s
DQ Read 2,038
DQ Write 1,702
DQ Mixed 1864
1,398% 1868 MB/s
Poor: 231%
This bench: 565%
Great: 565%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$94
300GB free
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 491 492 424 461 430 432 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
128% Outstanding
Read 484
Write 380
Mixed 382
SusWrite 455
96% 425 MB/s
4K Read 46.7
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 62.2
208% 72.3 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 351
DQ Mixed 332
259% 357 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 128%
Great: 137%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$94
647GB free
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 491 468 477 466 478 467 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
134% Outstanding
Read 515
Write 490
Mixed 457
SusWrite 474
109% 484 MB/s
4K Read 47.8
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 66.2
217% 75.8 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 372
280% 374 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 134%
Great: 137%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH64GX5M2B5600Z40 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
160% Outstanding
MC Read 61.6
MC Write 56.1
MC Mixed 55
164% 57.6 GB/s
SC Read 56.3
SC Write 59.5
SC Mixed 52.2
160% 56 GB/s
Latency 79.3
50% 79.3 ns
Poor: 139%
This bench: 160%
Great: 222%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X670E-E GAMING WIFI Builds (Compare 240 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 423%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 119%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 534%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X670E-E GAMING WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $2,573
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback