ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus G501JW

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	74.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Asus G501JW (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK G501JW
Memory	6.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20151028
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Nov 18 '17 at 08:17
Run Duration	85 Seconds
Run User	AUT-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4720HQ 80,960 User benchmarks, average bench 58% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	68% Good	Memory 82.7 1-Core 106 2-Core 196 74% 128 Pts	4-Core 345 8-Core 126 37% 236 Pts	64-Core 124 8% 124 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 68% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 18DD) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4549 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	3.93% Terrible	Lighting 4.07 Reflection 6.85 Parallax 7.16 3% 6.02 fps	MRender 8.33 Gravity 2.47 Splatting 7.65 5% 6.15 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.93% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron M600 SATA M.2 256GB 2,750 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 123GB free (System drive) Firmware: MA01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 73 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1097 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 99 99 34 (AE) Unknown 100 100 18 (B4) Unknown 0 0 1925 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 58 33 287763529770 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 99 99 1 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 7999056753 (F7) Unknown 100 100 250279231 (F8) Unknown 100 100 96992592	74.2% Very good	Read 511 Write 376 Mixed 404 96% 430 MB/s	4K Read 26 4K Write 70.4 4K Mixed 16.3 98% 37.6 MB/s	DQ Read 27.7 DQ Write 76.4 DQ Mixed 14.4 22% 39.5 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 74.2% Great: 110%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73EB0-YK0 Hynix 12GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	45.7% Average	MC Read 17.6 MC Write 15.8 MC Mixed 12.4 44% 15.3 GB/s	SC Read 13.6 SC Write 17.7 SC Mixed 15 44% 15.4 GB/s	Latency 75.7 53% 75.7 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 45.7% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical G501JW Builds (Compare 176 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 54%

Yacht

Workstation

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Asus G501JW

CPU
Core i7-4720HQIntelBench 58%, 80,960 samples	131x
Core i7-4750HQIntelBench 63%, 5,497 samples	45x

GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	85x
GTX 960MNvidiaBench 16%, 73,363 samples	63x
Iris Pro HD 5200 (V2 Mobile 1.2 GHz)IntelBench 6%, 5,483 samples	28x

SSD
MZNLF128HCHP-00004 128GBSamsungBench 43%, 7,448 samples	36x
SM951 AHCI PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $290Bench 185%, 5,772 samples	26x
X300s SATA M.2 128GBSanDiskBench 71%, 618 samples	12x

RAM
HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 16GBHynixBench 51%, 658 samples	34x
M471B1G73EB0-YK0 Hynix 16GBSamsungBench 53%, 472 samples	32x
HMT451S6BFR8A-PB Samsung 8GBHynixBench 53%, 676 samples	31x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback