Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 22% Surfboard	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 15.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	3.07% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	18.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-7020U 28,454 User benchmarks, average bench 40% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	15.1% Very poor	Memory 12.1 1-Core 51.4 2-Core 93.7 26% 52.4 Pts	4-Core 108 8-Core 83.7 13% 95.8 Pts	64-Core 84.5 5% 84.5 Pts
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 15.1% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake) 387,149 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Legend(17AA 3979) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8729 Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	3.07% Terrible	Lighting 5.6 Reflection 3.3 Parallax 8.4 5% 5.77 fps	MRender 0.3 Gravity 0.3 Splatting 0.1 0% 0.23 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.07% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Walram 240G 240GB 219 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 79GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2010232P SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 58 6.7 25 9.1 34 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	18.3% Very poor	Read 245 Write 195 Mixed 24 SusWrite 24.3 27% 122 MB/s	4K Read 9.8 4K Write 7.3 4K Mixed 4.2 24% 7.1 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 18.3% Great: 74%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD DDR4 NB 8G 2666 12GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 2133, 2133 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	16.4% Very poor	MC Read 5.5 MC Write 7.9 MC Mixed 4.1 17% 5.83 GB/s	SC Read 3.5 SC Write 6.5 SC Mixed 5.4 15% 5.13 GB/s	Latency 385 10% 385 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 16.4% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i5-7200UIntelBench 45%, 205,332 samples	154x
Core i3-6006UIntelBench 36%, 47,111 samples	90x
Pentium 4415UIntelBench 49%, 6,525 samples	77x

GPU
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples	289x
HD Graphics 520IntelBench 4%, 9,911 samples	90x
HD Graphics 610IntelBench 2%, 9,913 samples	54x

SSD
MTFDDAK256TBN 256GBMicronBench 62%, 1,130 samples	17x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	16x
SSDSC2KF128G8L 128GBIntelBench 64%, 1,307 samples	14x

RAM
HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 1x4GBHynixBench 32%, 32,443 samples	71x
M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GBSamsungBench 30%, 48,985 samples	62x
4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 1x4GBMicronBench 32%, 18,494 samples	55x