Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 82HT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics18.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive144% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 82HT  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220919
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 27 '23 at 16:43
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User BOL-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1165G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
59.5% Above average
Memory 57.5
1-Core 146
2-Core 241
80% 148 Pts
4-Core 334
8-Core 462
50% 398 Pts
64-Core 465
29% 465 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Legend(17AA 3801) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1960
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
18.3% Very poor
Lighting 21.6
Reflection 22.6
Parallax 25.7
18% 23.3 fps
MRender 22.3
Gravity 30.2
Splatting 20.5
20% 24.3 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SKHynix_HFS001TD9TNI-L2A0B 1TB
729GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11010C10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 490 494 491 555 550 546 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
144% Outstanding
Read 569
Write 581
Mixed 568
SusWrite 521
126% 560 MB/s
4K Read 47.1
4K Write 99.5
4K Mixed 62.9
205% 69.8 MB/s
DQ Read 808
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 648
461% 599 MB/s
Poor: 144%
This bench: 144%
Great: 287%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
52% Above average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 23.3
MC Mixed 15
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 23.3
SC Mixed 12
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 135
30% 135 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 52%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 82HT Builds (Compare 483 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 82HT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $226Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback