Clevo W55xEU

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive22.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (72%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
17 months ago, 17 months ago.
SystemClevo W55xEU  (all builds)
MotherboardCLEVO W55xEU
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20121102
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 29 '23 at 08:09
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 72%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3110M-$70
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
30.6% Below average
Memory 38.4
1-Core 47.3
2-Core 84.5
33% 56.7 Pts
4-Core 132
8-Core 137
18% 134 Pts
64-Core 142
9% 142 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Clevo(1558 0550) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
2.49% Terrible
Lighting 3.1
Reflection 3.4
Parallax 2.4
2% 2.97 fps
MRender 2.4
Gravity 2
Splatting 4
2% 2.8 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.49%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hgst HTS545050A7E680 127GB
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0303B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 98 106 103 101 99 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
22.4% Poor
Read 156
Write 88.4
Mixed 103
SusWrite 100
25% 112 MB/s
4K Read 5.8
4K Write 13.8
4K Mixed 7.5
26% 9.03 MB/s
DQ Read 25.5
DQ Write 66.9
DQ Mixed 33.7
29% 42 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 22.4%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot PSD34G13332S 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
16.1% Very poor
MC Read 6
MC Write 5.6
MC Mixed 5.7
16% 5.77 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 2.6
10% 3.57 GB/s
Latency 210
19% 210 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical W55xEU Builds (Compare 37 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Clevo W55xEU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $225
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $162Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback