TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Samsung 550XCJ/550XCR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemSamsung 550XCJ/550XCR  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NT550XCJ-K12G
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220223
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 09 '23 at 11:35
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10210U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
60.3% Good
Memory 73.9
1-Core 89.8
2-Core 185
66% 116 Pts
4-Core 256
8-Core 348
38% 302 Pts
64-Core 340
21% 340 Pts
Poor: 40% ↑
This bench: 60.3%
 Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Sanyo(144D C834) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7870
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
4.88% Terrible
Lighting 4.7
Reflection 5.6
Parallax 7
4% 5.77 fps
MRender 9
Gravity 6.3
Splatting 9.6
7% 8.3 fps
Poor: 3% ↑
This bench: 4.88%
 Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ssstc CL1-8D256 256GB
171GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CT22002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 569 375 211 225 234 220 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 1,234
Write 709
Mixed 694
SusWrite 306
163% 736 MB/s
4K Read 26.9
4K Write 43.2
4K Mixed 17.4
86% 29.2 MB/s
DQ Read 455
DQ Write 212
DQ Mixed 324
243% 330 MB/s
Poor: 86% ↑
This bench: 108%
 Great: 161%
SSD 1TB
643GB free
Firmware: U0826A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 335 290 344 350 356 363 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
71.4% Very good
Read 333
Write 294
Mixed 296
SusWrite 340
71% 316 MB/s
4K Read 19.7
4K Write 65.9
4K Mixed 20.1
90% 35.2 MB/s
DQ Read 213
DQ Write 243
DQ Mixed 45.8
85% 167 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑
This bench: 71.4%
 Great: 103%
SDXC Card 128GB
119GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 23 25 26 26 26 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
15.3% Very poor
Read 52.4
Write 24.6
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 24.3
38% 31.1 MB/s
4K Read 10.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.9
69% 3.73 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑
This bench: 15.3%
 Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD M471A1K43EB1-CWE 16GB
2667, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.1% Average
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 15
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 17.4
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 92.8
43% 92.8 ns
Poor: 49% ↑
This bench: 49.1%
 Great: 83%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical 550XCJ/550XCR Builds (Compare 566 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 550XCJ/550XCR

CPU
Core i5-10210UIntelBench 61%, 1,291 samples236x
Core i3-10110UIntelBench 58%, 394 samples162x
Core i7-10510UIntelBench 56%, 51,080 samples100x
GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 6,852 samples371x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 110,580 samples77x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 2%, 91 samples65x
SSD
CL1-8D256 256GBSsstcBench 130%, 516 samples33x
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples15x
SNVS500G 500GBKingstonBench 186%, 34,043 samples14x
RAM
SMS4TDC3C0K0446SCG 1x4GBUnknownBench 34%, 1,143 samples121x
SF4641G8CK8IEHLSBG 1x8GBUnknownBench 40%, 5,660 samples116x
SMS4TDC8C1K0446FCG 1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 185 samples60x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $149Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback