Today's hottest deals

Wortmann_ag TERRA_PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics23.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemWortmann_ag TERRA_PC  (all builds)
MotherboardGigabyte H81M-D2W
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130828
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 12 '23 at 14:13
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 41%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4130-$41
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
62.1% Good
Memory 90.9
1-Core 90.5
2-Core 149
68% 110 Pts
4-Core 192
8-Core 211
27% 202 Pts
64-Core 212
13% 212 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
Asus(1043 8553) 2GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 528.02
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
23.3% Poor
Lighting 28.3
Reflection 44.2
Parallax 27.8
23% 33.4 fps
MRender 34.5
Gravity 28.3
Splatting 25.9
24% 29.6 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 23.3%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSDPR-CX400-128-G2 128GB
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H190117D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 78 105 71 55 52 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
44.8% Average
Read 344
Write 73.2
Mixed 26
SusWrite 76.8
28% 130 MB/s
4K Read 18.9
4K Write 42.3
4K Mixed 20.1
77% 27.1 MB/s
DQ Read 111
DQ Write 16.3
DQ Mixed 68
49% 65.2 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 97%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$23
52GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 95 91 95 92 92 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
64.7% Good
Read 133
Write 132
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 92.6
70% 96.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
52.3% Above average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 20.2
MC Mixed 16.2
51% 18 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 17.5
SC Mixed 15
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 65.8
61% 65.8 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TERRA_PC Builds (Compare 2,501 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: Wortmann_ag TERRA_PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $188
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback