Asrock N68-GS4 FX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics60.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive17.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock N68-GS4 FX  (all builds)
Memory2.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150408
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 15 '23 at 03:19
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
66.1% Good
Memory 93.4
1-Core 65.2
2-Core 127
60% 95.1 Pts
4-Core 221
8-Core 264
31% 242 Pts
64-Core 255
16% 255 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300
Asus(1043 8769) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 528.02
Performing below potential (78th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
60.4% Good
Lighting 78.3
Reflection 77.7
Parallax 74.4
64% 76.8 fps
MRender 63.2
Gravity 74.9
Splatting 60.8
54% 66.3 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot Burst Elite 240GB
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ZD0R
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 45 45 45 46 46 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
17.4% Very poor
Read 78.2
Write 81.1
Mixed 67.7
SusWrite 45.6
15% 68.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 40.8
4K Mixed 6.3
35% 16.9 MB/s
DQ Read 3
DQ Write 48.3
DQ Mixed 7.7
11% 19.7 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 59%
WDC WD20 EZAZ-00L9GB0 2TB
692GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 138 144 139 140 140 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
17.8% Very poor
Read 123
Write 138
Mixed 65.1
SusWrite 140
26% 117 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 11.6
4K Mixed 1
14% 5.77 MB/s
DQ Read 0.6
DQ Write 11.1
DQ Mixed 0.9
2% 4.2 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 17.8%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM 1638 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
34.9% Below average
MC Read 12.6
MC Write 11.3
MC Mixed 10.2
32% 11.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 7
SC Mixed 10.6
26% 9.23 GB/s
Latency 61.3
65% 61.3 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N68-GS4 FX Builds (Compare 93 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68-GS4 FX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $210
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback