Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-17Q2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics8.26% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
20 months ago, 20 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star Titan GT77HX 13VI
MotherboardMSI MS-17Q2  (all builds)
Memory115.6 GB free of 128 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230103
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 16 '23 at 20:31
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13980HX
U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
107% Outstanding
Memory 54.7
1-Core 216
2-Core 431
116% 234 Pts
4-Core 850
8-Core 1,460
140% 1,155 Pts
64-Core 3,300
204% 3,300 Pts
Poor: 111%
This bench: 107%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
MSI(1462 13C4) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3511
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
8.26% Terrible
Lighting 9.4
Reflection 309
Parallax 10.1
8% 110 fps
MRender 12.7
Gravity 12.2
Splatting 10.2
9% 11.7 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.26%
Great: 10%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 4TB
3.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.00
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,969
Write 4,631
Mixed 3,172
946% 4,257 MB/s
4K Read 70.7
4K Write 166
4K Mixed 95.3
317% 111 MB/s
DQ Read 1,214
DQ Write 1208
DQ Mixed 1,139
876% 1,187 MB/s
Poor: 147% Great: 672%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R4GA3BB0-CQKOL 4x31.8GB
4 of 4 slots used
127GB SODIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
83.2% Excellent
MC Read 31.1
MC Write 35.8
MC Mixed 30.2
92% 32.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 27.8
SC Mixed 14.4
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 144
28% 144 ns
Poor: 83%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 127%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-17Q2 Builds (Compare 179 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 236%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 290%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MS-17Q2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback