MSI Z77A-G45 GAMING (MS-7752)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics20.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7752
MotherboardMSI Z77A-G45 GAMING (MS-7752)  (all builds)
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131030
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateFeb 16 '23 at 21:58
Run Duration106 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3550-$335
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
67.6% Good
Memory 88.3
1-Core 96.5
2-Core 189
73% 125 Pts
4-Core 266
8-Core 315
38% 290 Pts
64-Core 337
21% 337 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX 560-B
Sapphire(1DA2 E348) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1226 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.30.23.04
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
20.7% Poor
Lighting 26.2
Reflection 8
Parallax 35.7
21% 23.3 fps
MRender 24.8
Gravity 27.8
Splatting 20
19% 24.2 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 22%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
TGT EGON T2 240GB
155GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2227I
SusWrite @10s intervals: 258 322 303 386 251 140 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
39.9% Below average
Read 401
Write 360
Mixed 213
SusWrite 277
70% 312 MB/s
4K Read 10.1
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 5
23% 6.03 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
36.8% Below average
MC Read 12.4
MC Write 12.4
MC Mixed 11.4
34% 12.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 11.9
SC Mixed 10.2
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 69.3
58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77A-G45 GAMING (MS-7752) Builds (Compare 189 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI Z77A-G45 GAMING (MS-7752)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $387
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback