Supermicro X8DTL

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics26.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSupermicro X8DTL  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X8DTL
Memory20.3 GB free of 24.0039 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20121116
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateFeb 20 '23 at 17:12
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5687
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Memory 93.7
1-Core 67.9
2-Core 128
61% 96.6 Pts
4-Core 313
8-Core 511
50% 412 Pts
64-Core 830
51% 830 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
HP(103C 8338) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.1% Poor
Lighting 32.8
Reflection 34.5
Parallax 32.8
27% 33.4 fps
MRender 37.7
Gravity 33
Splatting 23.3
25% 31.3 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
LSI MR9265-8i 252GB
206GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.40
SusWrite @10s intervals: 240 279 288 287 288 286 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
USB3.0 Mobile Storage 480GB
37GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 27 27 27 27 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
18.3% Very poor
Read 54.3
Write 26.4
Mixed 26.9
SusWrite 26.5
41% 33.5 MB/s
4K Read 9.1
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 5.1
234% 5 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 173%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B5170FH0-CH9 M393B5170FH0-CH9 M393B5170FH0-CH9 M393B5170FH0-CH9 M393B5170FH0-CH9 M393B5170FH0-CH9 ATMEL 26DF321 60GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 33 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 36864 MB
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
60.6% Good
MC Read 27.8
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 25.1
66% 23 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 7.7
23% 8.03 GB/s
Latency 60.5
66% 60.5 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X8DTL Builds (Compare 164 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

System: Supermicro X8DTL

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 114% - Outstanding Total price: $117
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback