Today's hottest deals

Dynabook SATELLITE PRO C50-J

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics13.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive74.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDynabook SATELLITE PRO C50-J  (all builds)
MotherboardDynabook DBIIP305
Memory4.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220815
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateFeb 22 '23 at 10:33
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1165G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
43.4% Average
Memory 36.4
1-Core 144
2-Core 251
73% 144 Pts
4-Core 282
8-Core 332
40% 307 Pts
64-Core 367
23% 367 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Device(3100 0008) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9864
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
13.2% Very poor
Lighting 15.7
Reflection 14.6
Parallax 18.5
13% 16.3 fps
MRender 16.1
Gravity 22.8
Splatting 14
14% 17.6 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
C-E80T512G4-P3D3B3E13 512GB
392GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFD00.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 700 499 628 438 459 334 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
74.7% Very good
Read 307
Write 164
Mixed 532
SusWrite 510
86% 378 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 41.1
4K Mixed 25
87% 29.3 MB/s
DQ Read 121
DQ Write 79.1
DQ Mixed 205
124% 135 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 255%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2G43AB2-CWE 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
29% Poor
MC Read 9.6
MC Write 14.2
MC Mixed 8.4
31% 10.7 GB/s
SC Read 4.9
SC Write 10.8
SC Mixed 6.3
21% 7.33 GB/s
Latency 220
18% 220 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SATELLITE PRO C50-J Builds (Compare 82 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Dynabook SATELLITE PRO C50-J

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback