Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	43.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	47.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5540 605 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	56.7% Above average	Memory 67.6 1-Core 69 2-Core 136 54% 90.7 Pts	4-Core 248 8-Core 393 40% 320 Pts	64-Core 631 39% 631 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 56.7% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Asus(1043 8773) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.94 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	43.2% Average	Lighting 54.2 Reflection 54.5 Parallax 50.5 44% 53.1 fps	MRender 61.2 Gravity 48.9 Splatting 44.7 41% 51.6 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 43.2% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 671GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 172 182 190 201 202 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	47.4% Average	Read 243 Write 227 Mixed 212 SusWrite 182 49% 216 MB/s	4K Read 18.5 4K Write 24.4 4K Mixed 19 65% 20.6 MB/s	DQ Read 189 DQ Write 96.8 DQ Mixed 114 93% 134 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 47.4% Great: 133%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 2TB 505 User benchmarks, average bench 202% 510GB free Firmware: 1.0.00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 175 181 150 154 153 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	58.1% Above average	Read 388 Write 232 Mixed 277 SusWrite 160 59% 264 MB/s	4K Read 24.6 4K Write 23.2 4K Mixed 21.3 77% 23 MB/s	DQ Read 280 DQ Write 135 DQ Mixed 187 144% 201 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 58.1% Great: 450%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 CE M393B2G70BH0-YH9 ID:80 CE M393B2G70BH0-YH9 ID:80 CE M393B2G70BH0-YH9 ID:80 CE M393B2G70BH0-YH9 98GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 34816 MB Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	31.4% Below average	MC Read 12.2 MC Write 10.9 MC Mixed 10.5 32% 11.2 GB/s	SC Read 8 SC Write 5.8 SC Mixed 7.3 20% 7.03 GB/s	Latency 107 37% 107 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 31.4% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples	318x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples	188x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56701stBench 67%, 4,676 samples	180x

SSD
WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TBWDCBench 98%, 74,123 samples	38x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	34x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	34x

RAM
ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 58GBUnknownBench 50%, 261 samples	23x
ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 JE... 82GBUnknownBench 53%, 67 samples	19x
ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD H... 130GBUnknownBench 53%, 67 samples	16x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16