Acer Nitro AN515-55

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics35.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-55  (all builds)
MotherboardCML Stonic_CMS
Memory6.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201119
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateFeb 24 '23 at 19:32
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
37.7% Below average
Memory 27
1-Core 106
2-Core 176
53% 103 Pts
4-Core 270
8-Core 320
38% 295 Pts
64-Core 332
20% 332 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Acer(1025 143E) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.2849
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
35.3% Below average
Lighting 42.9
Reflection 67.9
Parallax 40.5
35% 50.4 fps
MRender 60.1
Gravity 37.7
Splatting 37.4
36% 45.1 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 43%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WDC PC SN530 SDB 512GB
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3900 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 593
Write 767
Mixed 678
153% 679 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 40.5
4K Mixed 26.8
87% 29.3 MB/s
DQ Read 283
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 228
173% 236 MB/s
Poor: 112% Great: 198%
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$21
120GB free
Firmware: 1001SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 69 69 69 70 69 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
43.4% Average
Read 82.6
Write 91.6
Mixed 43.9
SusWrite 68.8
52% 71.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
106% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 85F7 J6451U66J9266NG 12GB
3200, 2667 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
14.6% Very poor
MC Read 4.6
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 4.6
15% 5.27 GB/s
SC Read 2.7
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 3
10% 3.4 GB/s
Latency 273
15% 273 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Nitro AN515-55 Builds (Compare 15,982 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN515-55

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback