Acer Aspire A315-23

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive79.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
17 months ago, 17 months ago.
SystemAcer Aspire A315-23  (all builds)
MotherboardDL Lotus_DA
Memory4.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210810
Uptime2.5 Days
Run DateFeb 26 '23 at 00:05
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon Silver 3050U Graphics
FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
25.2% Poor
Memory 32.6
1-Core 62.2
2-Core 82.7
34% 59.2 Pts
4-Core 96.7
8-Core 138
15% 118 Pts
64-Core 136
8% 136 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 25.2%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Acer(1025 1456) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.30.11
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
1.63% Terrible
Lighting 1.5
Reflection 3.5
Parallax 1.9
1% 2.3 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 1.4
Splatting 4.1
2% 2.8 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.63%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ256HBJD-00BTW 256GB
182GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXM7201Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 374 390 377 424 459 479 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
79.7% Very good
Read 479
Write 393
Mixed 373
SusWrite 417
93% 415 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 35.7
4K Mixed 26.8
86% 28.1 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 144
DQ Mixed 166
128% 176 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 207%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905700-119.A00G Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 12GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
27.6% Poor
MC Read 7.2
MC Write 7.2
MC Mixed 15.5
28% 9.97 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 7.1
SC Mixed 11
24% 8.23 GB/s
Latency 240
17% 240 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire A315-23 Builds (Compare 671 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A315-23

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $120
Intel Core i5-12400F $117Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-13600K $195Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $393
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback