Today's hottest deals

Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A17 FA707RM_FA707RM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics26.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive223% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming A17 FA707RM_FA707RM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FA707RM
Memory9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220211
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 28 '23 at 15:11
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User UZB-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 6800H
FP7, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
51.1% Above average
Memory 54.6
1-Core 83
2-Core 148
54% 95.3 Pts
4-Core 256
8-Core 499
45% 377 Pts
64-Core 756
47% 756 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Asus(1043 1F2C) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.8.2
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.7% Poor
Lighting 32.2
Reflection 97.9
Parallax 51.2
26% 60.4 fps
MRender 23.8
Gravity 23.3
Splatting 47.9
28% 31.7 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 35%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GB
411GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1279 1313 1258 1236 1216 1162 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
223% Outstanding
Read 1,687
Write 1445
Mixed 1181
SusWrite 1244
312% 1,389 MB/s
4K Read 43.1
4K Write 91.7
4K Mixed 58.6
189% 64.5 MB/s
DQ Read 447
DQ Write 483
DQ Mixed 406
322% 445 MB/s
Poor: 99%
This bench: 223%
Great: 290%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOL CT8G48C40S5.M4A1 16GB
4800, 4800 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
95.5% Outstanding
MC Read 37.2
MC Write 35.1
MC Mixed 36.4
104% 36.2 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 30.5
SC Mixed 25.1
71% 24.8 GB/s
Latency 144
28% 144 ns
Poor: 96%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ASUS TUF Gaming A17 FA707RM_FA707RM Builds (Compare 44 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A17 FA707RM_FA707RM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback