Apple MacPro6,1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics21.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive174% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemApple MacPro6,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-F60DEB81FF30ACF6
Memory26.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220823
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 03 '23 at 13:10
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2-$345
, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
72.7% Very good
Memory 87.4
1-Core 97.1
2-Core 185
72% 123 Pts
4-Core 314
8-Core 484
49% 399 Pts
64-Core 472
29% 472 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD FirePro D300 (FireGL V)
Apple(106B 012B) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.36.01
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
21.7% Poor
Lighting 28.7
Reflection 29.3
Parallax 34.6
23% 30.9 fps
MRender 24.2
Gravity 24.6
Splatting 19.8
18% 22.9 fps
Poor: 20%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 24%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple SM0256G PCIe 251GB
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXW8SA0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 971 977 989 1031 975 892 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
174% Outstanding
Read 1,272
Write 1,188
Mixed 707
SusWrite 972
232% 1,035 MB/s
4K Read 35.4
4K Write 73.1
4K Mixed 43.7
148% 50.7 MB/s
DQ Read 447
DQ Write 368
DQ Mixed 413
308% 410 MB/s
Poor: 92%
This bench: 174%
Great: 203%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x31384A534631473732415A2D314739453220 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
96.3% Outstanding
MC Read 34.8
MC Write 40.4
MC Mixed 38.1
108% 37.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 13.3
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 70.1
57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 96%
This bench: 96.3%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacPro6,1 Builds (Compare 57 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: Apple MacPro6,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $635
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback