Today's hottest deals

Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409DAP_M409DA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 19%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 11%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics2.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409DAP_M409DA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X409DAP
Memory0.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211008
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 03 '23 at 16:05
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon Silver 3050U Graphics
FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
11% Very poor
Memory 6.99
1-Core 48.1
2-Core 75.5
22% 43.5 Pts
4-Core 81.4
8-Core 110
12% 95.6 Pts
64-Core 99.1
6% 99.1 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 11%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Asus(1043 10A2) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.30.44.13
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
2.76% Terrible
Lighting 2.5
Reflection 5.4
Parallax 3.6
2% 3.83 fps
MRender 3.9
Gravity 3.2
Splatting 7.2
4% 4.77 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.76%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ne-128 2280 128GB
45GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN10092
SusWrite @10s intervals: 549 180 158 119 96 97 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
66.6% Good
Read 497
Write 574
Mixed 414
SusWrite 200
95% 421 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 35.6
4K Mixed 24.8
79% 26.4 MB/s
DQ Read 293
DQ Write 148
DQ Mixed 176
142% 205 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 191%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
852GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 119 98 124 112 109 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
56.6% Above average
Read 86.6
Write 40.5
Mixed 21
SusWrite 111
47% 64.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.3
83% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
21.6% Poor
MC Read 9.4
MC Write 7.6
MC Mixed 8
24% 8.33 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 3
13% 4.47 GB/s
Latency 433
9% 433 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409DAP_M409DA Builds (Compare 36 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409DAP_M409DA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback