OEM X79-Turbo

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive51.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardOEM X79-Turbo  (all builds)
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220407
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 05 '23 at 05:48
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User VEN-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
74.9% Very good
Memory 87.8
1-Core 91.7
2-Core 182
71% 121 Pts
4-Core 335
8-Core 597
56% 466 Pts
64-Core 904
56% 904 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1H5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 103 63 81 41 40 MB/s
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
51.5% Above average
Read 238
Write 208
Mixed 211
SusWrite 60.5
40% 179 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 56.7
4K Mixed 31.1
109% 37.8 MB/s
DQ Read 180
DQ Write 23.6
DQ Mixed 28.5
40% 77.3 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
18GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 98 97 101 77 93 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
57% Above average
Read 104
Write 103
Mixed 67.4
SusWrite 94.1
68% 92.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 57%
Great: 69%
Mass Storage Device 64GB
58GB free, PID 125c
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 4.7
Mixed 5.2
6% 4.95 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
7% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 9JSF51272AZ-1 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 46
MC Write 37.2
MC Mixed 36.6
114% 39.9 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 12.2
SC Mixed 12.4
39% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 69.8
57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 101%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79-Turbo Builds (Compare 41 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat

Motherboard: OEM X79-Turbo

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 114% - Outstanding Total price: $117
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback