Asus PRIME H310M-CS R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics82.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive75% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME H310M-CS R2.0  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180914
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 07 '23 at 15:42
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 5600-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-9100F-$115
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Memory 92.2
1-Core 124
2-Core 248
87% 155 Pts
4-Core 427
8-Core 435
58% 431 Pts
64-Core 437
27% 437 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5600-XT-$300
Sapphire(1DA2 E416) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 6GB, Driver: 23.2.2
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
82.7% Excellent
Lighting 104
Reflection 124
Parallax 167
85% 132 fps
MRender 100
Gravity 119
Splatting 76.1
78% 98.4 fps
Poor: 77%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSTC-MM120-25 120GB
93GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V4.15.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 352 340 350 404 389 403 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
75% Very good
Read 376
Write 301
Mixed 290
SusWrite 373
75% 335 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 60.1
4K Mixed 16.1
97% 35.1 MB/s
DQ Read 184
DQ Write 224
DQ Mixed 30.6
71% 146 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 75%
Great: 75%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
2TB free
Firmware: CC29
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 202 202 201 188 202 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 168
Write 136
Mixed 39
SusWrite 197
98% 135 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 5.7
4K Mixed 0.7
212% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 105%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A5143EB1-CPB 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
73% Very good
MC Read 25.8
MC Write 29.1
MC Mixed 22
73% 25.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 28.7
SC Mixed 21.6
63% 22.2 GB/s
Latency 63.6
63% 63.6 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 73%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME H310M-CS R2.0 Builds (Compare 304 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H310M-CS R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $110
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback