Jumper QCYL-200

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.58% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (76%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemJumper QCYL-200  (all builds)
MotherboardJUMPER QCYL-200
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191030
Uptime5.8 Days
Run DateMar 11 '23 at 06:43
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU 76%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4510U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
62.4% Good
Memory 92.6
1-Core 60.2
2-Core 115
58% 89.4 Pts
4-Core 189
8-Core 190
25% 190 Pts
64-Core 188
12% 188 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Intel(8086 0A16) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
1.58% Terrible
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 1.3
Parallax 3.1
2% 2.07 fps
MRender 3.2
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 2.3
2% 2.2 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.58%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ZEUSLAP-256G 256GB
181GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0414
SusWrite @10s intervals: 347 41 14 17 16 9.7 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
38.1% Below average
Read 374
Write 299
Mixed 280
SusWrite 74.3
57% 257 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 59.7
4K Mixed 0.4
60% 26.2 MB/s
DQ Read 97.1
DQ Write 18.8
DQ Mixed 3.5
17% 39.8 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BRAN51288G16C1600L 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
18.5% Very poor
MC Read 5
MC Write 6.1
MC Mixed 4.5
15% 5.2 GB/s
SC Read 3.9
SC Write 4.7
SC Mixed 4
12% 4.2 GB/s
Latency 62.9
64% 62.9 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 18.5%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical QCYL-200 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Jumper QCYL-200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback