HP PPPPP-CCC#MMMMMMMM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics11.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP PPPPP-CCC#MMMMMMMM  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI 2A9C
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101006
Uptime21 Days
Run DateMar 16 '23 at 09:11
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 43%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 870-$100
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
68.1% Good
Memory 87.8
1-Core 82.1
2-Core 154
65% 108 Pts
4-Core 269
8-Core 350
40% 310 Pts
64-Core 346
21% 346 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6850
Sapphire(174B E174) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
11.7% Very poor
Lighting 16
Reflection 18.1
Parallax 14.1
13% 16.1 fps
MRender 12.4
Gravity 11.5
Splatting 10.1
9% 11.3 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$90
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 42 51 34 26 32 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Read 17.5
Write 39.3
Mixed 27
SusWrite 37.1
22% 30.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.4
77% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 108%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60
785GB free
Firmware: 50.0AB50
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 78 80 79 76 79 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
43.8% Average
Read 74.4
Write 80.2
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 78.3
47% 65.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.3
74% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 67%
Ext Hard Disk 3TB
2.5TB free, PID 0241
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 24 24 25 25 25 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
14.9% Very poor
Read 54.2
Write 25.5
Mixed 24.8
SusWrite 24.8
39% 32.3 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 1
55% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 41%
Hitachi HDS723030ALA640 3TB
2TB free, PID 1011
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 27 28 28 28 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
16.6% Very poor
Read 51.4
Write 28.7
Mixed 29.8
SusWrite 27.5
43% 34.4 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
62% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 21%
Ext Hard Disk 3TB
2.5TB free, PID 0241
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 71 71 74 75 74 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.8% Average
Read 120
Write 100
Mixed 64.2
SusWrite 72.6
115% 89.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
115% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
CD04CD04 F3 DDR3 1333 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
40.2% Average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 13.2
MC Mixed 12.8
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 10.6
SC Mixed 11.3
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 69.7
57% 69.7 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PPPPP-CCC#MMMMMMMM Builds (Compare 243 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP PPPPP-CCC#MMMMMMMM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $98
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback