Alienware Aurora R6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics27.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAlienware Aurora R6  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 07HV66
Memory22.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200611
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 17 '23 at 17:24
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User ARE-User
Background CPU 25%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$235
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
83.3% Excellent
Memory 84.4
1-Core 131
2-Core 237
85% 151 Pts
4-Core 443
8-Core 657
68% 550 Pts
64-Core 666
41% 666 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
Nvidia(10DE 146B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 528.49
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27.4% Poor
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 200
Parallax 0.2
0% 66.8 fps
MRender 188
Gravity 151
Splatting 0.1
80% 113 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 27.4%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB (2017)-$154
196GB free (System drive)
Firmware: B35900WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 272 257 182 200 139 206 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 817
Write 497
Mixed 380
SusWrite 209
105% 476 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 74.4
4K Mixed 33
127% 45.8 MB/s
DQ Read 584
DQ Write 471
DQ Mixed 420
344% 492 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 108%
Great: 155%
Samsung PM841 2.5" 7mm 512GB
109GB free
Firmware: DXT03D0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 243 310 301 299 297 306 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
60.6% Good
Read 243
Write 213
Mixed 139
SusWrite 293
50% 222 MB/s
4K Read 14.6
4K Write 47.9
4K Mixed 19.7
73% 27.4 MB/s
DQ Read 355
DQ Write 126
DQ Mixed 68.6
96% 183 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 85%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$59
832GB free
Firmware: MX4OAC70
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 150 151 147 150 150 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
95.8% Outstanding
Read 185
Write 176
Mixed 25
SusWrite 149
96% 134 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
147% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 95.8%
Great: 108%
WD Game Drive 8TB
3TB free, PID 2631
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 38 38 37 37 38 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
23.3% Poor
Read 51.2
Write 34.3
Mixed 30.6
SusWrite 37.3
50% 38.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.4
135% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 23.3%
Great: 120%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A2K43CB1-CRC 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
79.8% Very good
MC Read 28.7
MC Write 31.2
MC Mixed 25.3
81% 28.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 32.4
SC Mixed 24.6
70% 24.6 GB/s
Latency 72.8
55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aurora R6 Builds (Compare 2,137 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht

System: Alienware Aurora R6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 112% - Outstanding Total price: $299
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback