GPD G1619-04

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics15.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive205% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (73%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGPD G1619-04  (all builds)
MotherboardGPD G1619-04
Memory16.5 GB free of 32 GB
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221217
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 25 '23 at 06:23
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 73%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 6800U Graphics
FP7, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Memory 62.3
1-Core 115
2-Core 218
72% 132 Pts
4-Core 263
8-Core 395
41% 329 Pts
64-Core 548
34% 548 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Device(1E50 8018) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.3.2
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
15.4% Very poor
Lighting 17.9
Reflection 31.2
Parallax 30.9
15% 26.7 fps
MRender 25.7
Gravity 20.2
Splatting 17.6
17% 21.2 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Biwin CE480Y2D100-1TB 1TB
712GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.4.8.42
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1136 1191 1216 1591 1621 1632 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
205% Outstanding
Read 1,430
Write 1,514
Mixed 1,464
SusWrite 1,398
328% 1,452 MB/s
4K Read 58.2
4K Write 32.2
4K Mixed 35.7
151% 42 MB/s
DQ Read 704
DQ Write 82.3
DQ Mixed 166
179% 318 MB/s
Poor: 167%
This bench: 205%
Great: 339%
Generic MassStorageClass 513GB
333GB free, PID 0764
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.4 6.6 6.1 10 20 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
22.1% Poor
Read 74.5
Write 71.4
Mixed 84.3
SusWrite 10.4
79% 60.1 MB/s
4K Read 7.1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 3.3
220% 4.27 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 22.1%
Great: 64%
Generic MassStorageClass 128GB
119GB free, PID 0764
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.8 8.6 15 17 22 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
18.2% Very poor
Read 101
Write 15.7
Mixed 7.7
SusWrite 14.9
32% 34.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.4
18% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H9JCNNNFA5MLYR-N6E 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB 23h clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
98.2% Outstanding
MC Read 36.8
MC Write 34.1
MC Mixed 40.4
106% 37.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 34.4
SC Mixed 24.8
73% 25.5 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G1619-04 Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

System: GPD G1619-04

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 241% - Outstanding Total price: $293
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback