QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics128% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive214% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory33GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 33GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory29 GB free of 33 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 09 '23 at 01:28
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 13 cores, 26 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Memory 75.7
1-Core 96.5
2-Core 162
65% 111 Pts
4-Core 381
8-Core 755
67% 568 Pts
64-Core 1,401
87% 1,401 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Nvidia(10DE 2489) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2205 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 528.49
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
128% Outstanding
Lighting 177
Reflection 182
Parallax 173
144% 177 fps
MRender 187
Gravity 138
Splatting 117
117% 147 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 128%
Great: 136%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Samsung SSD 970 2TB
366GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1545 1571 1558 1586 1599 1609 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
214% Outstanding
Read 1,527
Write 1,630
Mixed 1,534
SusWrite 1,578
354% 1,567 MB/s
4K Read 33.9
4K Write 55.5
4K Mixed 43
136% 44.1 MB/s
DQ Read 338
DQ Write 275
DQ Mixed 301
227% 304 MB/s
Poor: 221%
This bench: 214%
Great: 431%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 33GB
0, 0, 0 MHz
16384, 16384, 1024 MB
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
64.6% Good
MC Read 27.3
MC Write 22.2
MC Mixed 21.8
68% 23.8 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 19.2
SC Mixed 17.3
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 88.9
45% 88.9 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 165%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) Builds (Compare 97 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO

System: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $499
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback