To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics51.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive31.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200629
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 09 '23 at 23:16
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User IRL-User
Background CPU 24%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
62.7% Good
Memory 72.8
1-Core 87.6
2-Core 175
64% 112 Pts
4-Core 306
8-Core 296
40% 301 Pts
64-Core 307
19% 307 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.4.1
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.8% Above average
Lighting 65
Reflection 7.8
Parallax 87.5
53% 53.4 fps
MRender 64.6
Gravity 75
Splatting 46.9
49% 62.2 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
VaIuetech-SSD/256G 256GB
114GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1022A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 35 36 43 40 38 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
31.3% Below average
Read 449
Write 17.2
Mixed 38.6
SusWrite 35.9
29% 135 MB/s
4K Read 16.7
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 8
37% 9.4 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GU6DFR8A-PB 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.1% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 16.1
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 14.4
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 95
42% 95 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,632 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback