Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 35% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	64% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2410M-$160 46,742 User benchmarks, average bench 48% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	32.8% Below average	Memory 43.5 1-Core 54.9 2-Core 97.3 38% 65.2 Pts	4-Core 126 8-Core 144 18% 135 Pts	64-Core 145 9% 145 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 32.8% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz) 209,058 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Intel(8086 2010) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	1.73% Terrible	Lighting 1.9 Reflection 2 Parallax 1.5 2% 1.8 fps	MRender 2.7 Gravity 2.4 Splatting 2.5 2% 2.53 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.73% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nikopol-128GB 128GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 74GB free (System drive) Firmware: HPS2818E SusWrite @10s intervals: 336 367 393 402 226 45 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	64% Good	Read 427 Write 381 Mixed 343 SusWrite 295 81% 362 MB/s	4K Read 22.6 4K Write 47.7 4K Mixed 13 76% 27.8 MB/s	DQ Read 130 DQ Write 172 DQ Mixed 19.8 52% 107 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 64% Great: 64%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 2x4GB 1,330 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	25.3% Poor	MC Read 9.1 MC Write 10.5 MC Mixed 8.4 27% 9.33 GB/s	SC Read 4.7 SC Write 6.5 SC Mixed 5.6 16% 5.6 GB/s	Latency 187 21% 187 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 25.3% Great: 78%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	5x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	3x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	1x

RAM
1600 8G 1x8GBDDR3Bench 29%, 179 samples	3x
M471B1G73EB0-YK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 52%, 10,651 samples	1x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	1x

Value: 65% - Good

Total price: $100

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16