Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire X1420

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics16.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive19% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (91%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire X1420  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire X1420
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110420
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 12 '23 at 06:07
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 91%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 645
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
35.7% Below average
Memory 48.1
1-Core 42.8
2-Core 83.2
35% 58 Pts
4-Core 136
8-Core 139
18% 137 Pts
64-Core 151
9% 151 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$131
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 23.2.2
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
16.8% Very poor
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 61.4
Parallax 90.9
0% 50.8 fps
MRender 61
Gravity 76.8
Splatting 46.9
49% 61.6 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Sol id State Dis 256GB
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 12 21 12 26 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
19% Very poor
Read 411
Write 19
Mixed 8.4
SusWrite 18.6
24% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 0.7
5% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 19%
Great: 61%
WD WD1600BUCT-63TWBY0 160GB
40GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 70 70 71 70 69 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
38.4% Below average
Read 63.7
Write 72.5
Mixed 47.7
SusWrite 70
47% 63.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73EB0-CK0 Kingston ACR16D3LU1KNG/8G 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
21.8% Poor
MC Read 9.6
MC Write 5.7
MC Mixed 8.4
23% 7.9 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 3.9
SC Mixed 5.6
13% 4.63 GB/s
Latency 168
24% 168 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 21.8%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire X1420 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire X1420

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback