ECS H610H7-M2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics69.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive80.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardECS H610H7-M2  (all builds)
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221031
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 15 '23 at 06:44
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-12100F-$85
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
94.9% Outstanding
Memory 89.5
1-Core 166
2-Core 338
106% 198 Pts
4-Core 539
8-Core 798
83% 668 Pts
64-Core 831
52% 831 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 94.9%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
Nvidia(10DE 13D3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 531.41
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
69.1% Good
Lighting 85.5
Reflection 88.4
Parallax 81.2
70% 85 fps
MRender 108
Gravity 77.3
Splatting 70.1
68% 85.3 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 76%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSTC-MMP120-25 120GB
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 307 117 79 60 80 60 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Read 467
Write 369
Mixed 340
SusWrite 117
72% 323 MB/s
4K Read 36.6
4K Write 78.7
4K Mixed 33
139% 49.4 MB/s
DQ Read 261
DQ Write 303
DQ Mixed 189
168% 251 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 81%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Apacer GD2.1827CH.008 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
108% Outstanding
MC Read 41
MC Write 40.2
MC Mixed 37.6
113% 39.6 GB/s
SC Read 22.6
SC Write 41.2
SC Mixed 29.3
89% 31 GB/s
Latency 67.8
59% 67.8 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 108%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H610H7-M2 Builds (Compare 19 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer

Motherboard: ECS H610H7-M2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $280
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback