Walton PASSION BX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.94% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
14 months ago, 14 months ago.
SystemWalton PASSION BX  (all builds)
MotherboardWALTON WPBX5105GR
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211213
Uptime262.2 Days
Run DateApr 18 '23 at 09:04
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User BGD-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10210U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
45.6% Average
Memory 64.1
1-Core 44.5
2-Core 92.2
42% 66.9 Pts
4-Core 148
8-Core 234
24% 191 Pts
64-Core 236
15% 236 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Clevo(1558 40C1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9365
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
4.94% Terrible
Lighting 5.3
Reflection 3.5
Parallax 6
4% 4.93 fps
MRender 4.7
Gravity 6
Splatting 10.5
6% 7.07 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.94%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Walton WS1128 128GB SSD
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 254 232 77 76 71 71 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
36.7% Below average
Read 225
Write 140
Mixed 294
SusWrite 130
44% 197 MB/s
4K Read 13.3
4K Write 44.7
4K Mixed 13.5
61% 23.8 MB/s
DQ Read 12.3
DQ Write 47.3
DQ Mixed 18.9
18% 26.2 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 82%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
926GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 114 114 112 112 112 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Write 99.8
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 111
68% 91.6 MB/s
4K Write 1.3
72% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 29% Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown WT-S8G2666H 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.6% Below average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 12
MC Mixed 10.2
35% 12.3 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 9.2
SC Mixed 10.7
26% 9.1 GB/s
Latency 116
34% 116 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PASSION BX Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Walton PASSION BX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback