Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 43% Speed boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	13.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X2 545 1,088 User benchmarks, average bench 45% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	45.2% Average	Memory 75.9 1-Core 43 2-Core 87.1 45% 68.7 Pts	4-Core 87.2 8-Core 88.7 12% 87.9 Pts	64-Core 86.6 5% 86.6 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 45.2% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8400 GS 18,254 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Gigabyte(1458 34ED) 128MB Ram: 128MB, Driver: 266.58 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	0.63% Terrible	Lighting 0.67 Reflection 1.31 Parallax 0.12 0% 0.7 fps	MRender 1.9 Gravity 0.37 Splatting 0.83 1% 1.03 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.63% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS1 20G1G0A-00SS 120GB 99 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 77GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z331 Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	13.6% Very poor	Read 227 Write 31.1 Mixed 34.6 21% 97.4 MB/s	4K Read 3.94 4K Write 2.15 4K Mixed 1.5 9% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 13.6% Great: 34%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905403-097.A00LF 2x2GB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM 1066 MHz Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	18.3% Very poor	MC Read 7.6 MC Write 5.8 MC Mixed 6.3 19% 6.57 GB/s	SC Read 0.1 SC Write 0.1 SC Mixed 0.6 1% 0.27 GB/s	Latency 88.5 45% 88.5 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 18.3% Great: 53%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

GPU
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	20x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	7x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	6x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 32%, 29,968 samples	5x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 31%, 37,489 samples	3x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBHyperX $35Bench 51%, 38,490 samples	3x

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $167

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16