Biostar Hi-Fi B150S1 D4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics7.44% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive57% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardBiostar Hi-Fi B150S1 D4  (all builds)
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180509
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 24 '23 at 12:47
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G4560-$31
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Memory 77.6
1-Core 100
2-Core 176
68% 118 Pts
4-Core 216
8-Core 246
30% 231 Pts
64-Core 245
15% 245 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 640
Nvidia(10DE 093D) 1GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
7.44% Terrible
Lighting 8.3
Reflection 10.5
Parallax 10.8
7% 9.87 fps
MRender 12.4
Gravity 10.8
Splatting 9.5
9% 10.9 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.44%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS032G34MNB-2200A 32GB
7GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1010AL00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 73 68 74 70 78 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
57% Above average
Read 386
Write 58.9
Mixed 127
SusWrite 72.7
35% 161 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 78.4
4K Mixed 23.4
107% 41.7 MB/s
DQ Read 157
DQ Write 70.5
DQ Mixed 99.6
78% 109 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 57%
Great: 57%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2013)
209GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 65 72 69 66 63 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
36.2% Below average
Read 59.6
Write 54.7
Mixed 37.4
SusWrite 66.2
40% 54.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown D4R8GL24A8R 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
42.6% Average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 12
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 13
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 85.2
47% 85.2 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Hi-Fi B150S1 D4 Builds (Compare 38 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Biostar Hi-Fi B150S1 D4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $295
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback