Supermicro X9DRi-LN4+/X9DR3-LN4+

Performance Results


Gaming 61% Destroyer	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 60% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	76.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	80.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Supermicro X9DRi-LN4+/X9DR3-LN4+ (all builds)
Motherboard	Supermicro X9DRi-LN4+/X9DR3-LN4+
Memory	43.2 GB free of 48 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150304
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Dec 03 '17 at 03:32
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2667 0 674 User benchmarks, average bench 68% CPU 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	73.3% Very good	Memory 84 1-Core 87.1 2-Core 169 67% 113 Pts	4-Core 338 8-Core 547 54% 442 Pts	64-Core 1,277 79% 1,277 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 73.3% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Gainward(10B0 1B81) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing below potential (27^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	76.4% Very good	Lighting 91 Reflection 111 Parallax 105 74% 102 fps	MRender 96.9 Gravity 97.1 Splatting 100 81% 98.1 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 76.4% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
IBM ServeRAID M1215 2TB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 148% 631GB free Firmware: 4.22 Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	147% Outstanding	Read 1,910 Write 654 Mixed 717 238% 1,094 MB/s	4K Read 21.4 4K Write 34.7 4K Mixed 18.8 75% 25 MB/s	DQ Read 203 DQ Write 171 DQ Mixed 37.9 69% 137 MB/s
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 147% Great: 163%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$175 73,119 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 137GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 5814 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1148 (B1) Unknown 89 89 394 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 76 52 24 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 90 90 9733 (EB) Unknown 99 99 729 (F1) Unknown 99 99 17160342602	80.1% Excellent	Read 510 Write 449 Mixed 445 104% 468 MB/s	4K Read 23 4K Write 47.5 4K Mixed 19.6 85% 30 MB/s	DQ Read 160 DQ Write 137 DQ Mixed 67 72% 121 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 80.1% Great: 116%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 720GB free Firmware: CC24 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 114 99 76115384 (03) Spinup time 96 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5418 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 81 60 4458920158 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 8907 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2245 (B7) Unknown 99 99 1 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 9 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 74 55 142188216346 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 511 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 88 88 25830 (C2) HDA temperature 26 45 -140737488355302 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -42915313215407 (F1) Unknown 100 253 25287921705 (F2) Unknown 100 253 31146099425	81% Excellent	Read 154 Write 129 Mixed 119 100% 134 MB/s	4K Read 0.92 4K Write 1.11 4K Mixed 0.31 93% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 81% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M392B5673FH0-CH9 24x2GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 24 of 24 slots used 48GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	82.3% Excellent	MC Read 35.9 MC Write 33 MC Mixed 29.9 94% 32.9 GB/s	SC Read 13 SC Write 6 SC Mixed 6.6 24% 8.53 GB/s	Latency 73.5 54% 73.5 ns
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 82.3% Great: 116%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X9DRi-LN4+/X9DR3-LN4+ Builds (Compare 43 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 53%

Yacht

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 60%

Destroyer

System: Supermicro X9DRi-LN4+/X9DR3-LN4+

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v21stBench 64%, 1,386 samples	7x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	5x
CPU:1stBench 70%, 34 samples	5x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	7x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,198Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	4x
GTX Titan XNvidia $615Bench 75%, 15,621 samples	3x

SSD
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	7x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $159Bench 336%, 200,600 samples	3x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $220Bench 290%, 10,709 samples	3x

RAM
M393B2G70DB0-CMA 2x16GBSamsungBench 52%, 85 samples	4x
M393B2G70BH0-YK0 Hynix HMT42GR7AFR4C-RD M393B2G70BH0-YK0 M393B2G70BH0-YK0 M393B2G70BH0-YK0 M393B2G70BH0-YK0 Hynix HMT42GR7AFR4C-RD Hynix HMT42GR7AFR4C-RD Hyn... 384GBSamsungBench 83%, 6 samples	4x
M393B1K70DH0-CK0 4x8GBSamsungBench 83%, 405 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $330

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16