Lenovo 82JU

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics119% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive215% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemLenovo 82JU  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory7.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230307
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 25 '23 at 15:28
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Memory 75.4
1-Core 116
2-Core 229
77% 140 Pts
4-Core 416
8-Core 729
69% 572 Pts
64-Core 1,058
66% 1,058 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070 (Laptop)
Legend(17AA 3A4F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.68
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
119% Outstanding
Lighting 160
Reflection 205
Parallax 172
130% 179 fps
MRender 176
Gravity 126
Splatting 122
113% 141 fps
Poor: 94%
This bench: 119%
Great: 127%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SFYRS1000G 1TB
385GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EIFK31.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1687 729 810 549 512 512 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
215% Outstanding
Read 1,737
Write 1805
Mixed 1,830
SusWrite 800
347% 1,543 MB/s
4K Read 43.4
4K Write 96.5
4K Mixed 64.1
199% 68 MB/s
DQ Read 858
DQ Write 675
DQ Mixed 818
598% 784 MB/s
Poor: 247%
This bench: 215%
Great: 573%
SKHynix_HFS001TDE9X084N 1TB
951GB free
Firmware: 41010C22
SusWrite @10s intervals: 464 923 2325 2331 2340 2385 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
213% Outstanding
Read 1,402
Write 1349
Mixed 149
SusWrite 1,794
264% 1,174 MB/s
4K Read 9.4
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 12.1
90% 45.1 MB/s
DQ Read 755
DQ Write 208
DQ Mixed 82.3
164% 348 MB/s
Poor: 213%
This bench: 213%
Great: 364%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
67.5% Good
MC Read 22.4
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 25.4
64% 22.4 GB/s
SC Read 23.1
SC Write 37
SC Mixed 25.9
82% 28.7 GB/s
Latency 89.6
45% 89.6 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 82JU Builds (Compare 5,338 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser

System: Lenovo 82JU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback