Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	25.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (85%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G-$75 104,122 User benchmarks, average bench 63% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	31.2% Below average	Memory 36.5 1-Core 52.7 2-Core 78.2 33% 55.8 Pts	4-Core 140 8-Core 223 22% 182 Pts	64-Core 224 14% 224 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 31.2% Great: 74%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Smart-120GB 120GB 27 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 29GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0628A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 84 98 39 90 54 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	25.4% Poor	Read 311 Write 13 Mixed 10.9 SusWrite 78.3 22% 103 MB/s	4K Read 6.1 4K Write 23.1 4K Mixed 0.5 22% 9.9 MB/s	DQ Read 76.3 DQ Write 22.9 DQ Mixed 1.5 14% 33.6 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 25.4% Great: 80%
Seagate ST3500630AS 500GB-$102 29,256 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 107GB free Firmware: 3.AAD SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 49 23 0 0 27 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	24.2% Poor	Read 58.7 Write 36.6 Mixed 38.5 SusWrite 25.3 30% 39.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.6 111% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 24.2% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	45.7% Average	MC Read 19 MC Write 18.2 MC Mixed 16.9 52% 18 GB/s	SC Read 5 SC Write 7.7 SC Mixed 10.8 22% 7.83 GB/s	Latency 219 18% 219 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 45.7% Great: 65%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 37%

Jet ski

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 34%

Sail boat

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	129x
Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples	125x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	111x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	115x
CS900 500GB SSDPNYBench 75%, 16,267 samples	77x
WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GBWDCBench 93%, 97,462 samples	47x

RAM
CL16-18-18 D4-3000 2x8GBUnknownBench 78%, 40,300 samples	48x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	44x
Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 2x8GBTeamBench 78%, 7,481 samples	39x

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $333

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16